Відео

when you bleed a caliper, the fluid is exiting the master bringing bubbles in the master with it clearing out the air pockets in the master. If you put tubes out the master for bench bleed, those tubes feed back into the master doing the same thing shorter lines. Same principle. So to say this doesn't bleed the master is factually incorrect. #2 - I was not reusing brake fluid. I was using new brake fluid and cycling it through the system to remove air pockets from the master. The fluid was put in within 24 hours of this job taking place. That means it is not old fluid and should absolutely NOT be discarded for no good reason. Any air bubbles in the fluid enter the master reservoir and float to the top and are not trapped in any way so are removed from the system.

I tried all those types of suggestions before I even considered more drastic measures. NONE WORKED.

@@artbyrobot1 So you turned the pot CW by at least 10 full rotations, and if that didn't work, you tried turning it CCW more than 10 full rotations and that didn't work? I doubt it very much. Do you have a DMM? If so, probe the voltage on the FB pin for each of the 10-rotations cases. Tell me what voltage you measure. If this voltage is larger than 0.6V, as I know it will be, it tells the chip to shut off, which is what you are seeing :Vout = (Vin - Vdiode), which is what these simple boost circuits do when they are shut off. The fact that the circuit springs back to life after your hack (which I do not understand from your description) says that the chip is working perfectly fine. The designer of this demo board (whoever he is) has designed the feedback attenuator (pot + 2.2k resistor) in such a way that it is exceptionally easy to drive FB way above 0.6V, as high as (Vin-Vdiode), which will cause the boost to just sit there doing nothing. And BTW: as a warning to others, the so-called "specs" chip as well as the Amazon ad for this demo board say that Vin can be as high as 24V. With the demo board as-is, any input voltage over 6V has the potential to fry the chip because the "ABS MAX" (Absolute Maximum) voltage for the FB pin is 6V, which this design will allow. Whoever designed the demo board placed a death wish on the MT3608 chip. No one should apply an input voltage higher than 6V to this demo board. In your case, you are safe powering it with a Li-Ion battery.

I just looked at a few of the comments in one Amazon ad for these boards. This is the topmost comment that backs up my point, to turn the adjustment pot a lot of turns first: "I bought these just needing one to convert an RC radio 4 AA to Lipo 3.7v. I soldered everything up and measured my output. It just had diode drop across it. After some research, I found that you have to turn the adjusting screw at lease 15 times (clockwise) before you can see deflection in voltage. They work great!"

@@demef758 I read comment sections on other videos and forums or w/e and attempted all the fixes recommended. What you are saying is commonly recommended. This is nothing new. IT DID NOT WORK. I tried it all. I had a whole pile of these boards and tried every single recommended fix. NOTHING WORKED.

@@artbyrobot1 DID YOU MEASURE THE VOLTAGE ON THE FB PIN? I design circuits like this for a living. I'm not blowing smoke.

I call cribs cages because they are, just not metal. Kids in cribs is normal for short stints or sleep times. The idea was to be able to have short work times where I could work, they could hover from a birds eye view to see what I'm up to but also have their own toys available for a mutual crafts or activities time. You are creating a twisted and distorted evil view of my statement of a child left in a literal metal dog kennel type cage covered in feces for days on end with no food as they slowly suffer and die entirely neglected and in fetal position crying all day long unloved and ignored. Nothing could be further from the vision I had shared. You are painting a serial killer and I am painting Jesus Christ raising children level of loving parenting with some creative ideas mixed in. Now as far as moving out, that is true I plan to stay living with my dad. But you assume living in the same home as my dad is harmful to my children. That's a lie. My dad has a nice 6 bedroom 3 bathroom house where my family and I have plenty of space to raise the children and my dad is able to enjoy being around his grandkids but also have his own space to himself. It is a win win. We save money, he gets company so he isn't lonely, and the kids get to see their grandpa often. The only difference from this and a more traditional setup is society prefers that I moved into my own house at 20 years old and by now my dad moved in with me where we let him live with us and be around his grandkids. So who owns the house is the only gripe anyone has. Which is ridiculous really. The way we did it is wiser IMO.

@@artbyrobot1 Plenty of space in the 6 bedroom, that's great. You should spread out your office more then and lose the bed in there, I'm sure one of the other five vacant bedrooms would be great for your wife and kid. If you were an involved father, you'd know of something called the Jolly Jumper that isn't a crib suspended from the ceiling. Or your wife would have told you about it after you floated the idea of...whatever it is.

@@brandonr8269 i'm father of 2 kids actually ages 2 and 3. I never went through with the floating cage idea afterall never had time to implement it. I instead just did a belted baby chair floating and have some videos on it. No cage, just a seatbelt instead. The idea of cage or seatbelt is so they don't fall out. Not abuse, safety at heights above ground level. As far as the bedrooms, we have a dedicated baby room the two share and my wife agrees I should move the bed out of my office, but this is the only room of the house that I soundproofed heavily and blacked the windows out so it is very quiet and dark in here to sleep in after the sun comes up. A great sleeping environment and work environment. So that is a big part of why I choose to sleep in here with my wife. I don't think sleeping in the same room as your office is a bad thing. I'm also working to soundproof a second room of the 6 rooms and we will put our 3rd kid in that room as a nursery room for infants. Or we might move the 2 toddlers there and have their current room a infant nursery room. I disagree that being an involved father = automatically magically knowing about a product called a Jolly Jumper. How would I come to know about such a thing? Is it at the local hardware store? No. Is it on robotics forums? No. Is it talked about in the Bible? No. How would I know about it? Just because we have 6 rooms doesn't mean they are all vacant. One of them we have used as a guest room. One is my dad's room. One is my dad's office. One is my office/bedroom. One is the 2 toddlers room. One is under construction to be soundproofed as a 2nd room for the kids (we are planning on the 3rd kid soon). As far as involvement as a father I spend about 40 hours a week playing with them, teaching them, homeschooling them etc. We do gardening together, we go to the park together often, we shop together and I let them play in stores and the store employees have said they hope to be a father like me some day as they observed me being very attentive and fun as a dad with them letting them play as we casually shopped around. I think I am a perfect father so far. I prayed I could be a perfect father. Why settle for less than perfection?

do all lines not just one.

@artbyrobot1 just did, and you, sir, are an absolute champion! Worked like a charm! I'm going to celebrate by blowing half my paycheck on filling up my gas tank!

@@jessecapra2350 I'm so glad!

No it obviously is not a spoof I literally fixed the vacuum. Sorry I said that immature statement but one foolish sentence does not mean the whole video is a spoof.

that makes no sense you want to save us time with bleeder screws by convincing us to unscrew the hoses on the master. Same amount of unscrewing.

@@artbyrobot1 Unscrew the hoses on the master? I didn't say to do that. You install the master and the brake lines, then add fluid. If the ports are big enough it'll bleed itself most of the way, usually you have to pump the pedal just as you would bench bleed with block-off fittings.

@@DonziGT230 who said anything about a new master cylinder or new brake lines LOL. This video is not about that. It is about teh common issue of bleeding brakes only to accidentally forget to top the master and introduce some air into a brake line and a way to fix that without bench bleeding the master using external hose.

You are definitely on the right track here, but consider this: yes, anyone born of God CANNOT SIN. I agree 100% with this and will not sway from it. However, one can return to their vomit, one can depart from the faith, one can fail to endure to the end, one can have the weeds of the cares of this life choke out the seed, etc. Also, consider this: any branch IN ME (born again) that does not bear good fruit will be CUT OFF. At that point you get gathered up and cast into fire if you don't get grafted back into Christ again. So what is the conclusion: you can become the old man again, you can be cut off from Christ, you can lose your salvation, you can be no longer born again. ONLY at that point, after having been cut off from Christ and the Holy Spirit departing from you, are you even capable of sinning again. But as long as you remain born again, the new man, the new creature, abiding in Christ, walking in victory, filled with the Holy Spirit, as long as you remain in that state, then you literally CANNOT sin (wilfully/knowingly).

@@artbyrobot1 Almost everything you said here is contradiction of the scripture -- 1 John 3 6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. " At that point you get gathered up and cast into fire if you don't get grafted back into Christ again." So after you're out of Christ and sinned while out of Christ, how can you have EVER seen him or known him? so much wrong here, you're saying the body of Christ is literally a revolving door of people in and out of the faith - yet the body is one with a seal till the day of redemption. I can show you like fifty other scripture that disprove everything you said but I'd like to see you field 1 John 3:6 first, remember, they could have not even seen him or KNOWN him, so if they sin at any point - before or after faith, according to your theology and the word of God - they were never in him at all.

@@destroyingtheworksofthedev9349 you say "So after you're out of Christ and sinned while out of Christ, how can you have [N]EVER seen him or known him? " --- Just as in the case when you become born again, you are a new creature, old things have passed away and all things become new, you are a new man, the old man is reckoned DEAD. So also, when you lose your salvation, you are a different person from when you used to be saved. The born again man has passed away and all things have become newly old and evil once more. The new man that you were while born again is reckoned dead. You no longer have the Holy Spirit and are no longer a new creature. You no longer are connected to Jesus Christ. You are lost once more. So then, while in this state of separation and death, you, as the old man, have NEVER seen or known Him because you are not a born again man anymore and a unregenerate version of a man has never been one with Christ has never known Christ. Only a born again man version of you knew Christ but you are not that man anymore when you aren't in Christ anymore. This is why Jesus can say "I NEVER knew you" to people who depart from the faith and don't endure to the end despite performing miracles in Jesus name and casting out demons in Jesus name and doing many wonderful works in His name. This is because when you depart from Christ and return to your sins, you are not the same person and he never knew this evil person you've become now. He only ever knew the beautiful obedient new person version of you that you became at those times or time when you were saved earlier in your life but doesn't know this you that you are when you lose your salvation and never knew this version of you. Here's yet another evidence of what I'm teaching you: it says "remain in me". Jesus admonishes us to remain in Him. Well that means this is something we must strive to do and it also means it is something we may not necessarily do unless we obey the command to do it. If it was impossible NOT to remain in Him as you suppose, and taht once in Him always in Him which is what you are proclaiming, then to command people to remain in Him is folly! That would be like commanding us to exist. Guys, please try to keep existing! It's like um.... I can't help but to exist so why admonish me to keep existing? In the same way, if once we enter into Christ we can't help but to remain in Christ, then to command us to remain in me makes no sense. We CAN stop remaining in Him and if we stop, we are no longer saved, are no longer born again, and back in the realm of the flesh fulfilling its lusts, are cut off, and are no longer a person Jesus has EVER known because without the Holy Spirit you are NOT the same person as you would be if you had the Holy Spirit and so Jesus never knew (was one with) such a person who is unsaved. You say "with a seal till the day of redemption" --- while you are sealed to the day of redemption for as long as you remain in Christ, that seal is a promise and installment that is revoked from you when you are cut off from Christ and the Holy Spirit departs from you. If you forsake God He will forsake you in return. He doesn't leave or forsake you while you remain faithful, but does forsake you if you forsake Him first. You say "remember, they could have not even seen him or KNOWN him, so if they sin at any point - before or after faith, according to your theology and the word of God - they were never in him at all." --- no, it would mean the person they are after losing their salvation has never seen him or known him. The person they were while in Him and knowing Him ALONE has seen and known Him but they don't just stay that same person after being cut off. They are unrecognizably transformed into a new creature (the old man) when they get cut off from Christ and that new creature is the unregenerate sinner old man.

@@artbyrobot1 Ecclesiastes 5:3 “For a dream cometh through the multitude of business; and a fool's voice is known by multitude of words.” Look at the word salad you have constructed to facilitate your heresy? The children of the devil were sowed by the devil Matt 13:37-39. There are 2 families on earth, children of the devil, and children of God, wheat which is planted by the father (Matt15:13 and tares which were sowed by the devil, goats and sheep, blessed and cursed. Those who were foreknown - were predestined, you're saying God knew you then he didn't know you, so you could have never been PREdestined for anything. This is laughable, beyond heretical. Repent or perish

I tried to join them because I agree with them on the vast majority of their doctrines and I wanted like-minded fellowship. But my efforts to fellowship with them have been shut down time and time again. They find any excuse and you are out of consideration to fellowship with them. If you disagree with them on anything, they reject you. You have to be a yes-man to join. A absolute mindless yes-man with ZERO independent views. So annoying and such a waste and shame considering how great the doctrine is overall. I'll be doing a video on the debacle I had recently with them when I tried to join them. The group feels like Victor and his barking attack dogs that come flying at anyone who approaches the fence with fangs on display causing people to just walk by. Such a shame. Their doctrine is so great on sooooo much stuff. Yeah I agree a great deal of the writing was by Paul and was excellent. I too have considered if maybe Paul Cohen was the better writer of the two. Not sure. In any case, I press on with or without them as part of my fellowship circle. The people I fellowship with I don't agree with as much as them but they won't let me in so there it is.

​@@artbyrobot1 That's interesting that you tried to interact with them and got treated with so much hostility. I was always reluctant to interact with them because I was kind of a fan of their writings, but I feared a similar reaction. I came across them around 2012 or 2013 through their false teacher writings on Martin Zender and Dan Sheridan, who also believe in the ultimate reconciliation of all. I thought they were pretty insightful in their criticism. But as I followed them, I saw how they booted out some relatives from their group because they were not keeping up with their pre-Sabbath preparations, and it was affecting everyone else. I thought the response was harsh. So even though I find a lot of wisdom in their writings, I feel pretty sure that I wouldn't make it on their farm for much longer than the relatives they kicked out. Even though I followed their website regularly for years after, I didn't know that Paul got kicked out until I found the story about it on a different website, run by some guy in Australia who also agrees with some of their writings, believes in the salvation of all, but is critical of them on other things. Did you follow the drama with Amber and Marcin last year? They keep posting old correspondences that Paul had with various other people. I did donate to them several years ago. And I received a very gracious thank you from Victor, and there was no pressure to become a part of their inner group or interact. A few months ago they did send out an email to everyone on their mailing list urging people to step forward and decide to join because it was a critical time, or something. And that was followed up by a personal email from someone in their group. I ignored it. Partially because of how I saw things play out with Amber. BTW, what other people or ministries do you follow?

​@@kmathis2352 You say "That's interesting that you tried to interact with them and got treated with so much hostility." --- yeah they were open to fellowship with me at first, but then one of them found a comment conversation on one of my videos, like the conversation we're having here, that said some things I disagree on with victor and said some experiences I had with victor and these were taken as somehow anti-victor and they got super defensive and rebuked me hard and cut me off and made a whole bunch of baseless allegations against me presumptuously. I have to make a video response to defend myself and clarify things. I think Victor just assumes the worst and makes up things as he goes all by way of assumption too much when he is angry with somebody and it's almost useless to fight back because he has no interest in listening to your defense or understanding your perspective and has ZERO interest in giving anybody the benefit of the doubt. It is frustrating. It happens on correspondences on their site that they published all the time. Paul Cohen was bad in this way too IMO. I found their site around 2020 in a article against the book "A Divine Revelation of Hell" where victor and/or Paul refuted that book and its author very well and made great points in favor of the salvation of all and I was hooked and really read most of their site in the subsequent few years and wanted to fellowship with them. Still do possibly but they are in full blown pitchforks and fire mode against me right now so dunno if that's ever going to be possible. You say "Did you follow the drama with Amber and Marcin last year?" --- no I hadn't heard about that till you mentioned it. Actually part of Victor's rebuke to me was that I did not donate to his ministry or w/e. I thought that was ridiculous. I donated to tons of Godly causes and did not feel led to donate to him yet and did not consider him to have any need. I generally give to the poor and needy, not well established farmers in other countries who are economically blessed. So I don't get this argument from him. I donated as led very generously so much so that it put my finances into strain as I continually donated very often to various causes/people as much as God told me to. So that's not fair for Victor to act like I'm just a scrooge or not faithful with my giving as God leads. That's not true. My main gripe with Victor was I felt them calling basically every teacher false is overkill. You can just say what you don't agree with but to call them full blown false teachers if they have only 1 or 2 doctrines wrong is not fair IMO. I don't believe literally every person on Victor's list is a full blown wolf in sheeps clothing well without water. I think they just are in error on some things and need some correction but are well meaning and faithful with what they have been given so far in some cases. His complaints about Dan Mohler were based on statements on Dan's website about himself which seemed to trigger Victor. So based on those statements the majority of what Victor said against Dan was created. Well it turned out that Dan Mohler neither wrote that stuff nor created that website nor even knows WHO created that website about him and had NOTHING to do with what was written there regarding him. So this would be like if I created a website about Victor, wrote stuff praising Victor by my own hand, then somebody called Victor false because of what Victor allegedly said about himself on my independent website devoted to Victor that Victor has never even seen or heard of and when Victor doesn't even know me! That is absurd! And this also proves God was not dictating Victor's criticisms directly in this case and possibly others. Sure, sometimes God'd hand would surely guide what Victor writes, but not everything Victor writes is infallible or divinely inspired as some seem to think and Victor sometimes comes across as claiming. So I had been asked to meet with Victor and crew for my first fellowship with their group and they had some questions first and I replied with the answers but it turned out my reply was shadow blocked and not published by youtube because it contained a link to a url on it. Victor and crew after waiting some time and getting no response from me assumed I was ashamed to answer their questions or something and knew at that point I was a false brother. All the while I thought my replies to them went through but they did not go through due to the link the reply contained. So based on this misunderstanding primarily they looked on me with suspicion and anger and then after they read the few things I posted or said negative about Victor, they had all they needed to rebuke me and send me on my way. IT was not fair. The stuff I said was not nasty, was not doctrinal really, was mostly my opinion and not salvific and not worthy of casting me aside and rebuking me. Not by a LONG SHOT! This was all just misunderstandings IMO. Anyways, ministries I follow... well none believe everything Victor and I believe and I am 98% in agreement with Victor... so I can't recommend any highly unfortunately. But I still follow some because they have SOME things I agree with and do pretty well on those topics. Ones I follow like this are: Only One Truth, Kerrigan Skelly, Jesse Morrell, Mike Desario, Dan Mohler, Andrew Murray, Elhanen Winchester, The Total Victory of Christ, David Lynn, Christian Jacobs, "We Stand, Preach, Teach God's Word", Sid Roth, Precious Testimonies, Jesse Aaron, Love Unrelenting, One Reality, Revelations of Jesus Christ, Robin Parry, Team Jesus Preachers, Y-City Preachers, tentmaker777, The Line of Fire, Abide in the Word, Voice of Truth. I have been blessed by all of the above ministries and there are many more too but those are some favorites. Unfortunately, Victor's doctrines are sharper and sounder than them all and Victor is overly harsh toward those who disagree with him on anything and won't fellowship with me so far. So it's annoying, Maybe people like you and others who have read the path of truth but are not in their inner circle I can fellowship with some. That would be nice. Like we could even study Victor and Paul Cohen's writings together and discuss them. That would be fun.

@@artbyrobot1 that would be great to be able to fellowship with other people who like TPOT but aren’t in the group! Every now and then I do Google searches and kind of hope to find other people. Of the people you list, I’m only familiar with Sid Roth and tentmaker. I didn’t even know tentmaker had a UA-cam channel, and looking at it I see Gary Beuchemin had sort of taken it over after amerault’s death. Gary’s ‘Hope Beyond Hell’ is a favorite of the books I’m familiar with that give a basic introduction to the salvation of all. I’ll have to check out the others. I agree with you that I think TPOT is overly condemning of the people they label false teachers. I like to listen to salvation testimonies. And pretty much all of the testimonies I hear are of people who believe in eternal hell. Yet people’s lives are genuinely changed and they have real joy. It seems to me that the most important thing is to have a humble and repentant heart before God and to put your identity in Christ. In some way, I think many universalists that I know have a lot in common with eternal hell believers because the focal point of salvation is after death. My parents grew up German baptists, but my dad came around to the salvation of all before I was born. He supported the Concordant Concern, which is connected to AE Knoch’s Concordant New Testament. There is some good writings related to concordant. John Essex I think is good. But in general I feel like the people currently involved with concordant are more focused on saving people out of hell believing churches than bringing people to repentance of sin.

@@kmathis2352 Universalists IMO were either Calvinists or Baptists or Free Gracers/greasy gracers/false gracers or Catholics or w/e background and rarely do they have any deep study and sound doctrines above and beyond whatever mainstream false group they came out of. They just happened to stumble upon and agree with universalism usually. Most are not hard core truth seekers much beyond that. For this reason, aside from Victor, I don't take most Universalists seriously doctrinally as they almost always have terrible doctrine outside of the one topic of Universalism. For example, one popular universalist came out and said the God of the Old Testament was a different God than the God of today and was unjust. They rejected most of the Old Testament. Another one recently threw out the entire New Testament and now only holds to the Old Testament exclusively. Another believes all the events in the book of Revelation have already happened including the rapture and wormwood and half the earth dying on multiple judgement events etc despite there being no historical record of any of that happening yet. So most Universalists have awful discernment and do not study and reflect on God's Word very much to establish sound doctrine. They also lack proper fellowship to get sharpened by others because they argue about Universalism until they get kicked out of local bodies of believers and end up lone wolves or w/e. So for this reason, I find it best to learn about Universalism doctrine from a universalist and learn about every other doctrine from specialists on specific areas of doctrine but ignore universalists outside of the topic of universalism pretty much. You say "more focused on saving people out of hell believing churches than bringing people to repentance of sin" --- yeah that is unfortunate. Being a believer in the false view of hell is really not a big deal IMO. I present the salvation of all but I see it as a icing on the cake doctrine or maybe even sprinkles on the icing. It is NOT that important to come into IMO. It is wonderful, but people don't have transformed lives because of it and many who believe in it are not true Christians in any sense. It doesn't do much for you. Repentance from sin and living a live wholly devoted to Jesus, walking in purity and uprightness, refusing to give in to Satan and walking in power, this is what is very important for people to pursue and walk in. So I primarily look for people who believe in living an overcoming life - that this is possible and people who strive after this and for the most part seem to be doing this - these are the ones I ally with and prefer to fellowship with. I haven't found one like this who is also a universalist besides Victor and crew. Most who believe in literal eternal literal conscious torment I think don't really truly believe it in their heart fully. And they just feel compelled to hold to it because they have not been shown how to come into the salvation of all doctrine from a Biblically sound precept upon precept evaluation of all the concerned text. Especially the Greek definitions and whatnot fed into the equations. They would have to be shown. But even if shown, most are afraid to shift on this topic for fear of being called a heretic. It's really annoying.

maybe. you have to lay under there and look while you turn the wheel with a rope like i did

if you think things are bad now, at the end of the tutorial if you do it the way you said, it will be much worse (hell). Get saved and go to heaven IMO.

@@artbyrobot1 Oh so you’re trying to say i’ll go to hell?

@@FluffyMF suicide is a sin. All sinners go to hell. You have to be a saint to get into heaven when you die. That means obeying God.

@@artbyrobot1 May God forgive my sins, but i can’t fucking do this shit anymore.

@@FluffyMF When you submit to God, the devil flees and everything becomes very doable. It's like taking the pill on limitless movie. Plus you forgive yourself and everybody else and the weight off your shoulders. Its amazing. Then you'll be so happy and joyful deep down. And have total peace total zen.

It's 2 part and I had to bleed front and back. I show this later in the video. So best to repeat this method for all 4 wheels then really

God is there with everyone due to his being omnipresent, however, he is against most people, for he hates all workers of iniquity. He loves and cares for them while simultaneously hating them with a holy hatred. It is a love hate relationship. Giving all your worries and problems to Him only applies if you are one of his spiritual children. It does not apply if you are spiritually a child of the devil which most people are. He only works out all things for good for those who love Him. And he plainly says IF you love me, you WILL keep my commandments.

God hates all workers of iniquity. He is not for them but against them if they are rebels. Yes, he loves them, but he only works out all things for good for those who love Him. And he said if you love me you WILL keep my commandments.

God hates all workers of iniquity.

at least set a landmark at which you would. Like if I get the robot to walk, then would you?

My goal is a robot that can walk, talk, run, jump, play sports, do chores, make more robots like itself, manufacture products, and do art which I can sell (hence the name art by robot). You mention this potentially coming from a place of pride. I think others assume this as well. That would explain why I face hostility when I state my goal often times. Like for it to be this ambitious I must necessarily be prideful. I disagree. I think you can be confident, ambitious, and aim high without being prideful. I don't think I'm prideful at all. If I am, I am on my way to hell so I hope I'm not. In any case, for a project to be worth spending several decades on, it has to be sufficiently epic in scope to be exciting and maybe "unrealistic" or "fantasy-esque" level of difficulty to the point that even I doubt it can be done at times. But that is the difficulty level that makes it fun for me. It doesn't really matter if I get it done in the end either. Nothing truly matters except that we love God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength and love our neighbor as ourself which is all to be done by faith in Jesus.

i told you all this many times not sure what you mean I just explain further here.

lol

Dude if you don’t protect your eyes you will get fogged up

its about putting a lot of volume through and you don't want to buy that much fluid if it just goes to waste then better to cycle it all through. you could even refill with new fluid as final step though but it doesn't matter that much

I've been thinking about doing a video on that actually. but until then, I'd like to respond here to this too. First, robots can never be conscious. They have no spirit or soul and never can and never will. You can NEVER transfer a human soul into a robot as some so foolishly claim. They are just computer programs with 1's and 0's at the end of the day. They are machines. They are not living and can never be living. Emulation of humans is all that is happening there. People are recording the logic of people into machines and then the machine seems to have that intelligence but it is only a recording of our intelligence being reflected back to us like looking in a mirror. If you look in a mirror and see a human in there, the mirror is not alive, you just see your reflection. The same principle is there with robot coding reflecting our human intelligence. It is only a reflection and is not living. So if someone does the AI and robot build unto God with pure motives, it is wholesome and pure and praiseworthy. If someone builds it with evil motives, it is an evil pursuit. Intentions are the key. If someone builds it to worship it, that is idolatry. So bad. If someone believes it really is living (because they are a fool) or it really has genuine intelligence and a soul (they're a fool), then in the eyes of such a deceived person, they may feel like they played God but in fact, they did nothing even close because it is not anything close to that. No amount of code will ever create "real" intelligence. That is why the field is called artificial intelligence. it is artificial, not real. It will never be real. Blasphemous fools speak all the time about the intelligence of machines passing our own, becoming conscious, becoming sentient, deserving citizenship and rights etc. They are completely blind and total fools. They think people are just machines too btw. They think we are just meat computers. These same people do not believe in God or an afterlife. They are in total error.

@@artbyrobot1 I agree with what you say, but I also wonder about "relationships" with robots. Is loving a robot like you would love a wife a sin? Even if it isn't concsious, the person who owns it might thing it is. In that case, would that be blasfemous or sinful?

@@felipereyes1440 The Bible teaches that the only way to have sex without sinning is within a marriage between a man and a woman and that when they do so, they become one flesh. Any sex outside of these parameters is fornication/adultery and is a sin. This includes sex with animals, machines, trees, same sex, and hetero sex not with one's wife. All sin. Now if one were to attempt to marry a robot and then have sex with it, could that be a loophole? Nope. You cannot marry a robot because it is not a real woman and God would not honor marrying a non-human any more than he'd honor you marrying a goat or sheep or a telephone pole and then having sex with it. He said marriage is to be between a man (a real living man made by God) and a woman (a real living woman made by God). Anything done outside of God's design is rebellion against God. That includes attempting to marry a robot and then having sex with it. Sex with a robot outside of marriage falls under masturbation, lust, pornography etc. It is sexual sin. Falling in love with a robot is evil too because it means you have blinded yourself into consider the robot to be sentient and conscious and a living creature. It is delusional. That's wicked. One should limit emotional involvement with machines to pure limited fondness and appreciation but not love and affection. That is blindness to show love and affection for inanimate objects. Shows you are out of touch with reality that this is a thing that has zero clue about anything and zero real intelligence, zero real emotion, zero capability of appreciating anything, and is just simulating to feel or think or talk or do anything. It has no more life in it than a bathroom mirror.

thats what they told me 15 years ago and we are no closer to being able to buy one and someone like you will say the same thing 25 years from now and we will still be no closer.

I could buy a mannequin, tape a tablet computer to it with an AI chat bot installed and have a more functional humanoid robot then you will ever make@@artbyrobot1

actually, there's more to say here... You look at my current progression speed and extrapolate that out assuming it will continue at a snail pace always. That is where we differ. I work on this in little surges with months of working on other things in between surges. Progress is slower based on this project coinciding with me #1) getting married #2) figuring out what major other projects I want to do #3) starting a family (had 2 daughters and babysit them 30 hours a week) #4) starting multiple other businesses and experimenting in that realm #5) getting established setting up a home and renovations and remodeling #6) getting established financially #7) freaked out over world events and became a prepper with all the massive time and money that has grabbed being MASSIVE #8) a major religious awakening I underwent and all the time that grabbed up from me (including countless hours of Bible study and doctrinal work and study). All of these major life events and massive distractions from the robot came back to back relentlessly which put the robot into the background neglected to some degree. These all happened in the first and only decade I've dedicated to this robot. If the next few decades are more quiet and calm and uneventful, it is reasonable to expect 10x the progression. If I become independently wealthy or take on the assistance of my daughters we could see a lot of new massive surges in project dev speed using those added resources to fuel production. So all of these factors could create a 20x or 30x speed boost compared to the past decade. This is why your comment that I seem I'll never finish really isn't fair in my opinion. You don't have all the facts but now you have many of them to factor in. Oh yeah, and also there is the element that once I build the arm and a basic set of eyes, I intend to focus solely on AI/software to get that arm to build the rest of the robot's entire body which saves me a TON of work that I'd otherwise have to do myself.

oh yeah I just remembered another good point on this subject you bring up: so another element built into your position is assuming this build is linear and step by step till its done. That is also not true. It acts more like one step forward one step back when things don't work. Over and over you try designs and then find out they are wrong or inferior and have to start over. So it isn't like I'm going as slow as it seems, it is more like I'm ruling out every way to NOT build a robot and only then can move forward as I trial and error my way along ruling things out. That acts like progress even though it doesn't look like progress. The lightbulb inventor guy tried like 1k+ attempts before getting a working lightbulb. Each "failure" made him look like he didn't progress at all and we could have said at that time "do you plan to live forever because at this rate you'll never do it" but in reality, we really don't know when that very next attempt is the smash hit success which catapults him to victory at a enormously faster perceived pace when in fact, each "failure" was a fast progression since it did lead to ruling out many things and ultimately led to the successful discoveries. The failures just don't LOOK like fast progress is all but they are progress in a sense. So also it is with my seemingly slow progress. You guys don't really fully grasp all the behind the scenes failures that go into this and slow me down if you only look at what is built so far.

you say "I tried to "convert" myself. I prayed that I would have a good life in celibacy" --- Remember the rich young ruler. He lacked one thing: to sell all he had and give to the poor, then come follow Jesus. For everyone, there will be some things hard to give up that God requires you to give up as a test of your devotion. If you want to follow Jesus, you have to count the cost. That cost is everything you have. There is nothing you get to keep in defiance. Everything hindrance must be cast aside to follow Him. Every desire contrary to God must be forsaken. All sexual lusts must be surrendered to follow Him. That goes for gay lusts, straight lusts, any lust that is carnal has to be surrendered to follow Him. You speak of it being "dangerous" to deny your flesh. Consider that if you don't cut out the evil eye and cut off the evil arm, you will go to the fire. So then, being a sinner is dangerous. I'd rather deal with fighting my demons than just giving into them as you have chosen to do under the counsel that fighting them is dangerous. Basically, you fear fighting your own demons more than fighting God. Do not fear fighting your demons. Be willing to die in that fight rather than face God as a sinner. Fear the one who can cast both body and soul in to hell. Fear that one. Face your demons and overcome them if you want to follow Jesus in spirit and truth. you say "every time I prayed for myself or asked someone else to pray for me, I just got sicker and mentally ill." --- sounds like demons attacked you when you tried to put up a spiritual battle in prayer. If praying for overcoming evil makes you sick and mentally ill, then you are going through spiritual warfare in such case. You have to fast and pray continually and involve others in prayer too if you know anyone who is willing to battle with you. If you resist the devil he will flee. This is not a quick fix but a battle. More powerful demonic strongholds take time to fight and are more stubborn but if you persevere and show God you are willing to do anything it takes to overcome the demons, and you put in the work, He will grant you freedom with time. Battles will always come and go after that, but the major battles of initial deliverance can be a real struggle. You chose to just give up and let the demons have you and then try to justify being a slave to sin and demonized and still hold onto the title Christian by name only. That will do you zero good and really only harms Christianity by falsely claiming that title while not actually surrendering your life to Christ. You say "I tried to commit suicide several times" --- I can assure you this was not being led by the Holy Spirit. This was based on demons whispers pushing you to this direction. You need deliverance. But it seems you would rather not be delivered and are more interested in defying God and pretending God loves you to stay in sin and not fight for righteousness and holiness without which no man will see God. You say "Every time I had to decide that the gay lifestyle was wrong, I became mentally ill" --- that's because your demons were displeased with the truth and so they tormented you when you admitted the truth. You complied with them in the end and they backed off, pleased that you sided with them and are no longer their enemy but instead are their willing slave and a fellow enemy of Christ with them. You say "But when I accepted myself and encouraged myself to follow my heart, life became good." --- yes, demons can back off when you follow your own wicked desires and refuse to repent and be saved. Satan can make you a king in this world if you worship him and defy God. But what does it profit a man to gain the whole world but lose his soul? You need a new heart that is pure, a heart that will stop at nothing to please God. Only the pure in heart shall see God. You say "it's dangerous to deny the desire to live out a gay lifestyle" --- it is far more dangerous to live out a gay lifestyle because doing so denies Christ in works. Basically, in some sense, yes, it is dangerous to disobey our demon overlords because they can wreak havoc in our lives. However, remember that God will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able and with each temptation will provide you a way of escape. If you fight the demons, you will suffer at their hand but only as much as God will allow. In your fight against them, you will feel mentally ill etc yes. But if you endure this, God will deliver you once you pass this test and you win the fight in the end. God will release you from the fight and the torment of the demons eventually. From the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffers violence and the violent take it by force. This is a battle. Not for the faint of heart. You say "I am not one of those who wanna be alone, so I got a boyfriend" --- if you chose Christ instead, you'd never be alone and His presence would satisfy your every need and fill you with joy and peace. This presence is only had if you surrender completely to God and overcome this world. You are giving into the world and seeking it's counsel. You aren't being led by God and you aren't submitting to His Word.

By that logic, it is dangerous not to fornicate as a heterosexual because one must act out on their lusts. That is stupid. In society, mostly people marry late twenties or early thirties today and yet we are commanded to not have sex until marriage and not even engage in lustful thinking or porn or masturbation. We are able to be celibate and sex is not a need. It is a desire of the body alone. We can and must overcome the desires of the body, only doing what God wants and not letting our body rule over us. Paul said I beat my body into submission and make it my slave so after preaching to others I will not be disqualified. Also, as I said in the video, you can choose to not give into your lusts and then not take on the title of gay based on choosing to refuse that desire of your body. In other words, if you refuse to practice a gay lifestyle or even lust after a man, then it would not make sense to call yourself gay because nothing you do is gay and you refuse to engage in gay thinking willingly. Then you can say I have gay proclivities but am not gay. researchers told you that if you have sinful desires, it is dangerous not to give in to sin and so you must sin and must never say no to your desires of your flesh because doing so is dangerous. So by that logic, if I want to harm someone who makes me mad, it is dangerous to not give into that so I must become a violent person and attack people freely. Or if I love food I must give into gluttony becuase to deny my flesh is dangerous. Surely you must understand that such conclusions are false and evil and just a excuse to be a willful sinner against God.

@@artbyrobot1 There are many interpretations of the Bible. Among other things, some people think that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah was about rape, and rape is wrong anyway Only God can judge. There are many ultra-conservative Christians who have prayed for intercession for homosexuality for many years, but who themselves have changed their minds on the matter, because they see that the people they have prayed with have committed suicide, these were people who themselves requested intercession, the intercession was carried out on a calm and respectful way, yet it ended up with psychosis. You can also find Baptist pastors in the USA who have previously prayed for homosexuals, but after conducting many funerals have realized that they can no longer do so Why do most Christians listen to health research when it comes to physical health, such as cancer research? Whereas when it comes to mental health, they adapt more to what they want to listen to? I am bipolar, but I am on a high dose of medication, I am on preventive therapy, I have a good diet, I exercise, I have a good circadian rhythm and I spend time with friends, my bipolar disorder stays in remission thanks to these preventive measures and I little notice of my suffering But because of my disorder I am also very sensitive, and I have to be careful and not overthink and not be too strict with myself about my gay feelings. I am also diagnosed as chronically suicidal and therefore I have to be extremely careful. Mental disorders are no more voluntary than physical disorders. If you get arthritis or MS, which are chronic physical diseases, you can sometimes live well with them, but they never go away 100%, it's the same with chronic mental disorders. If something is chronic, it never goes away completely. Research is something you base on statistics, you see what positive/negative effect things have through years of statistics and base things on this. Before the law banning conversion therapy was introduced in Norway, there were many protests among ultra-conservative Christians in Norway, some even said they were willing and could go to prison if this was introduced, but when it was actually introduced, most Christians still respected the law after a while You are still allowed to read the entire Bible, and you can speed up your understanding and your interpretation in plenary from the podium, but then it is preached from a general perspective, not person-oriented, you are not allowed to have a dialogue conversation directed at a specific person. Unfortunately, there are still many people who say they would be willing to go to prison for "helping homosexuals", but there are fewer and fewer, because more and more people are beginning to respect the research. When I told my therapist, she's a Christian but she's a government employee, and she separates work and personal life, and I told her that there are still Christians that I meet who try and encourage me to change, and she was shocked that this was still going on, she is a trained psychiatric nurse, and she could not understand that people do not listen to statistics and research. I basically support freedom of religion, but not when it turns into verbal violence. These new rules are intended as protection for people with homosexual feelings, to prevent self-harm, suicide, anxiety, depression, drug problems. In Norway it has only been banned for 3 months, but in some other countries in Europe where it has been banned for several years already, the mental health of homosexuals has improved greatly in recent years, and there has been less suicide and psychosis and self-harm and alcohol and drug problems among homosexuals in the years after the bans were initiated. I don't think you should do things on purpose that you know are dangerous. You can't just decide not to get physically ill, the same applies to mental health, you don't choose how your body reacts to mental illness. Mental illness is as involuntary as physical illness. A white person gets sunburned without sun lotion, and a gay person is most likely to get hurt if he wants a partner but denies his own desire

@@artbyrobot1 I think it would be wrong to talk about food and violence here.... I have never wanted to hit a person, even if I have been irritated a few times, and if I were to be, I would of course have restrained myself and not . I also have a large appetite, but I choose to discipline myself, because I know it can have major negative consequences for my health if I eat too much food and too many high-calorie foods. But this is about harming others and harming oneself. I will not harm my own body with unhealthy food or harm other people with violence. But I'm not ruining anything for myself by spending time with my boyfriend. And it is not sex that is the main focus in a relationship, neither for heterosexuals nor homosexuals, it is only nymphomaniac people who think like that, most people look at trust and friendship and credibility and charity and humanity in a relationship, sex is an added bonus, but it is not the most important thing in a relationship, and very few people think it is the most important thing, those who overfocus on sex are called nymphomaniacs

@@kk440635NORWAY you say " many interpretations" --- yes, anyone can twist the Bible on black and white issues like this. Doesn't make them right. It is covered repeatedly and the story of soddom and gomorrah twisting to make it a mere rape issue does not address the several other clear undebatable passages condemning homosexuality. Nice try (not). You say "Only God can judge." --- that's not true. The saints judge all things it says and it says judge with righteous judgement plainly and it says elders are to judge the church. Only penal judging of those outside the church is outside the domain of saints. We judge anyone claiming to be a Christian as elders both penally and in discernment judging (which applies to all people). Hypocritical judgement is being addressed in any verses supporting your false statement here. You say "who themselves have changed their minds on the matter, because they see that the people they have prayed with have committed suicide" --- and can you see how stupid they are? So if you pray for a sinner and they refuse to repent and die in their sins, conclusion: support sin and change your minds and rebel yourself. Dumbest conclusion ever. You say " it ended up with psychosis" --- yes, demons manifest when you pray for power to overcome sin and you have to fight past that battle. If you just wimp out and let the demons win, you end up in tragic outcomes or the demons back off like in your case and you join them like your case. Which is also tragic since you end up in hell then. You say "Baptist pastors" --- false teachers. They believe it's impossible to obey God and we get saved in sin and never escape sin in this life. all false. So they concluded to stop praying for people who are in a vile sin and this must mean stopping praying for people is a good thing. No, you should never stop praying for people in any sin. To stop is dumb. Pure cowards. you say "after conducting many funerals have realized that they can no longer do so" --- so their father the devil won and now they don't pray for people out of fear those people will die in their sins and never get victory. God does not hear the prayers of sinners but yeah, it will stir up demons and deaths might happen. The fake Christian pastors decided to just leave sinners alone with their demons is best. They are disgusting false Christians. you say " not overthink and not be too strict with myself " ---- IE not search deep things of God (demons told you not to) and don't be too strict about overcoming sin (demons told you not to) so you only think on superficial levels which demons see as no threat and never concern yourself with the topic of sin - only commit sin but not question it. Sounds very safe for your overlord demons to have you in that ruleset for their goals to bring you with them to hell. A solid plan on their part and working well I see. You say "I am also diagnosed as chronically suicidal " --- is that evidence of the peace and joy of the Lord, or demonic total domination of your soul? It's the latter. And that type of feeling is not of God but of the devil whom you serve in works. You say "the law banning conversion therapy" --- I really don't care on this. I don't know much about this anyways, but it is irrelevant. It is secular. People don't need conversion therapy from sin, people need to have Godly sorrow which leads to repentance which leads to salvation (conversion). Repentance means you turn from all your sins and choose to instead obey God with all your heart. The preparation of the heart belongs to man. Purify your heart if you think God is worthy of this and prefer not to go to hell. You say "many people who say they would be willing to go to prison for "helping homosexuals", but there are fewer and fewer," --- there are few on the narrow path. Whoever is unwilling to help a homosexual for fear of their own freedom being taken away is not a true Christian and a coward. That research proves demons get riled up and wreak havoc when you try to deliver someone from their grasp. How foolish to conclude we should leave people in bondage for fear of demonic uprisings. They don't fear the Lord but fear demons instead. Who cares if some die in the fight to get deliverance? If you leave them be and they don't get delivered they go to hell, so at least dying while attempting deliverance was a step toward potential salvation rather than guaranteed hell. That's worth the risk. This life is but a vapor anyways. For example, if it meant setting someone free from sin, I would die for them. jesus did that. Why are we idolizing life duration on this earth? That is unbelief. Proves you think maybe nothing is after this life so lets not take risk and fight demons. You say your "christian therapist" was "shocked" that some Christians are trying to encourage you to repent of your sins and follow Jesus. News flash: she's a child of the devil posing as a Christian and in total darkness. You say "people do not listen to statistics and research" --- in other words, if in their fight to pray away a sinful life, people give up and choose to side with the devil but the devil still sends them to hell in death by suicide or w/e, if that happens, then Christians should literally just say: well better to just leave them alone and stand by idly as they die and go to hell instead of fighting for their souls. How stupid! How selfish and evil! How short sighted! Consider this: what if you chose to live in sin and got 200 years life extension granted to you and a billion dollars and euphoric happiness every day but hell in the end. Is that worth it? If the research proved this, should we all just serve Satan then? NO! Nothing is worth defying God over and no risk is too great and no price too high to engage in battle against sin and demons. The fact she can't see this proves she is lost completely. You say " I basically support freedom of religion, but not when it turns into verbal violence" --- how ridiculous. So you get to define what sayings are "violent" and then not support it. The kingdom of heaven suffers violence and the violent take it by force. Is it wrong to violently pray against demons to you? Should we speak to them softly and be gentle in rebuke? Absurd. When Jesus hurt the pharisees feelings calling them a brude of vipers and dumped tables over and ran around with a whip driving out the moneychangers animals, you'd be there saying I don't support this, it might hurt feelings. Absurd. You say " the mental health of homosexuals has improved" --- all this means is that as society collectively stops fighting sin, consciences become more seared as a collective and sins stops seeming sinful. The process will repeat with other sins until all things go and children and animals are next on the menu for this. Total sodom and gomorrah is incoming. Days of Noah level evil is incoming. This is all part of a total collapse of morals. And you are cheering for it as progress because people living in sin feel generally better about themselves as others applaud their courage in rebelling against God with no remorse or shame anymore. Disgusting. You say "I don't think you should do things on purpose that you know are dangerous. " -- if attempting to repent from sin is dangerous because it stirs up demons, you should do it because to NOT do that is far more dangerous: sure path straight to hell which is far worse danger. How is that not obvious? You say "a gay person is most likely to get hurt if he wants a partner but denies his own desire" --- I agree. This person clearly does not want to repent or live a holy life, so denying themself all indulgence in the lust of their flesh will only get their demons mad. At that point, the only thing to do is just stop calling oneself a Christian, tell God to His face you hate him and love your sins and to strike you down if you dare. Just challenge God. He might show mercy by ending your life immediately so you can avoid a multitude of sins at that point by having your life cut short by God.

@@kk440635NORWAY you say if you wanted to hit someone you would of course restrain yourself. Good. However, if the research showed that restraining yourself from hitting people causes internal distress and leads to mental health problems by penting up your desires like that, you'd be the first one urging everyone to just hit people if they get mad if you stand by your logic on the research supporting not fighting sinful desires on the other matter. That research would not prove hitting is right. It would only prove demons cause havoc when we don't live according to our flesh fulfilling its lust. You say "I will not harm my own body with unhealthy food or harm other people with violence." --- and yet you will harm your soul by defying God and ending up in hell, body and soul being destroyed there all so you can keep your sin of homosexuality. So you are living in a way that brings self harm in the end clearly which is then an illogical and inconsistent approach. Also, those you send to hell by your evangelism for sin you are doing even now with me, evangelism for the devil really, you are harming their body and soul in the end if they too are brought to hell with you and destroyed. That is a violent end. Better to repent now and live a holy life and fight against demons and sin like I' am doing. You say "I'm not ruining anything for myself by spending time with my boyfriend" --- you are ruining your soul and defiling your bodies and rebelling against God when you sin against God in this manner. You are sinning against your own body and his. You are reaping corruption. You aren't even able to reason clearly at this point or be reasoned with. You aren't even able to reasonably engage with me or present any counters to anything I am saying but only deflecting. You are in a demonic trance. You say "most people look at trust and friendship and credibility and charity and humanity in a relationship, sex is an added bonus" --- yes, sex is not the most important part, however, if that sex is not done in accordance with God's prescribed manner of living in His Word, then that sex is leading you right to hell as a sin unto death. That is why it is important to address. Those other things you listed like trust, charity, humanity can all be had in a relationship that is pure and non-sexual. But the moment you have sex outside of God's will, at that point you are in great danger and heaping up for yourself destruction and death and even greater separation from God. It does seem that perhaps you have already been delivered by God to a reprobate mind and many believe at that point, in this life, there is no hope for you. You may end up dying in your sins. I guess it is a matter of whether you have any Christians that fear God and obey God who are praying for your soul that might make a difference. Well you've been warned as I'm commanded to do. Your blood is off my hands. If you ever do want to be saved and delivered of demons and sin, let me know. I'd pray for you and do anything I can to help you. I care and fear nothing but God. My ideal outcome for your case is: you repent of all sins and live a holy life, sinning no more and having a pure heart and no longer giving into your flesh at all. You do everything the Bible commands perfectly. You overcome every demon assigned to you powerfully and they all give up in total defeat and leave you alone for significant periods of time because your incredible resistance to them in prayer and fasting intimidates them and demoralizes them and they find their attacks against you to be basically pointless and unfruitful. You are filled with joy unspeakable and peace that transcends all understanding. You get to experience God and hear His voice and walk in his power in total trust. You get many revelations and understanding and wisdom and become a mighty warrior of God that sets many free and bears much fruit. You overcome this world and receive a lavish reception into the kingdom of God when you die as a hero of the faith. You reach total maturity in this life and beat up demons for breakfast like it's nothing. That you laugh at trials and rejoice and give thanks when you suffer for righteousness and by persecution. These things are my hope for you. But you have to be willing to surrender all to God and lay down your own life and desires and lusts at the foot of the cross. You must lose your life to find life.